217427

Long-range Tesla Model 3 beats Mercedes-Benz EQS in cold weather range test in Norway

Credit: Motor.no

Despite having more range on paper, the Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 didn’t match the Tesla Model 3 Long Range in a recent cold-weather range test in Norway.

Winter testing, conducted by the Norwegian Automobile Federation (NAF) Automotive publication enginePut a total of 31 electric vehicles (EVs) on the road to see which one can drive the farthest.

The test was also conducted to see which electric vehicles experienced the largest deviation from their specified range when driving at low temperatures.

With temperatures ranging from 0°C to -10°C (14°F to 32°F), the long-range Model 3 topped the list for longest distance traveled at 521 kilometers (324 miles).

The Model 3 was also among the leaders in terms of yaw, seeing just 15.5% off its WLTP rating range of 614 km.

The EQS 580 has a WLTP rated range of 645 kilometers (400 miles), but was only able to travel 513 kilometers (318 miles), 20% less than it would in optimal conditions.

Also among the group of cars tested was the Y Long Range, which impressed a lot with its 451 km mileage, 11.05% lower than expected.

engine Note that the Model Y’s results were particularly impressive because the last 16 kilometers (10 miles) of its driving was in cooler temperatures and on more slope than the BYD Tang, which topped the results with just 11.05% deflection.

Below are the full results of the test. (free: Haakon Ballstad)

Model (temperature varying from 0° to -10°) wltp numbers Stop deviation
Tesla Model 3 LR Dual Motor 614 km / 14.7 kWh 521 km -15.15%
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4Matic 645 km / 18.3 kWh 513 km -20.47%
BMW iX xDrive50 591 km / 21.4 kWh 503 km -14.89%
Tesla Model Y LR Dual Motor 507 km / 16.9 kWh 451 km -11.05%
Volkswagen ID.3 PRO S 539 km / 16.3 kWh 435 km -19.29%
Kia EV6 2WD 528 km / 16.5 kWh 429 km -18.75%
Kia EV6 4WD 484 km / 18.0 kWh 428 km -11.57%
NIO ES8 LR – 7 Seats 500 km / 21.5 kWh 425 km -15.00%
Volkswagen ID.4 Pro 485 km / 18.4 kWh 414 km -14.64%
Hyundai Ioniq 5 2WD 481 km / 16.8 kWh 408 km -15.18%
BMW i4 M50 497 km / 19.0 kWh 406 km -18.31%
Skoda stylish iV80X 477 km / 18.2 kWh 403 km -15.51%
Porsche Taycan 4 Cross Turismo 456 km / 22.4 kWh 402 km -11.84%
Polestar 2 LR Single Engine 517 km / 18.6 kWh 400 km -22.63%
Audi e-tron GT 463 km / 21.1 kWh 392 km -15.33%
Xpeng P7 470 km / 19.4 kWh 383 km -18.51%
Audi e-tron Q4 40 485 km / 18.6 kWh 380 km -21.65%
Hyundai Ioniq 5 4WD (19 inch) 460 km / 17.7 kWh 369 km -19.78%
Hyundai Ioniq 5 LR 4WD (20 inch) 430 km / 17.7 kWh x x
BYD Tang 400 km / 21.6 kWh 356 km -11.00%
Volkswagen ID.4 GTX 475 km / 18.6 kWh 353 km -25.68%
Audi e-tron Q4 50 four 459 km / 19.1 kWh 349 km -23.97%
Skoda stylish iV80 509 km / 17.7 kWh 347 km -31.83%
Tesla Model 3 SAR 448 km / 14.0 kWh 346 km -22.87%
Polestar 2 LR . twin engine 476 km / 20.2 kWh 340 km -28.57%
Dual Drive Polestar 2 LR (with luggage) 470 km / 19.5 kWh x x
Burning Cobra 395 km / 15.4 kWh 339 km -14.18%
Recharge Volvo C40 437 km / 21.1 kWh 333 km -23.80%
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 401 km / 17.7 kWh 331 km -17.46%
BMW iX xDrive40 402 km / 20.7 kWh 316 km -21.39%
Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4Matic 407 km / 18.1 kWh 315 km -22.60%
Opel Mokka E 338 km/16.2 kWh 263 km -22.19%
Peugeot e-2008 320 km/15.6 kWh 228 km -28.75%

Source: Motor.no

#Longrange #Tesla #Model #beats #MercedesBenz #EQS #cold #weather #range #test #Norway

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.